This hypothesis, all illustrations and formats:   © 2015 by Joseph R. Balint     All Rights Reserved     Comments?    Contact:   joe@inhouseimagery.com

The origin of the Universe might have looked more like this ' o ' than this ' . '!   The difference being energy not matter. 


There are many opportunities to assume that sub-atomic particles are the source of the magnetic fields that bind and structure the elements of atomic evolution. This works well until an explanation of the source of the mass of those sub atomic particles is brought into question.


So, sadly, the search was on for the missing Higgs Boson. One last particle to account for the net mass of each and every Proton.  I say sadly because now the substance of the sub-particle needs an explanation that fits into the creation of our Universe.


Why would anyone care what was smaller than that?  

To answer that one, I can only speak for myself.  If you believe that matter is made of smaller bits of matter then welcome to the world of particle physics.  And congratulation on the success of the LHC at CERN.

 

So, speaking for myself, in the form of a hypothesis, I seek a better, more logical origin of particles than smaller particles. ’Something from nothing’ needs a better explanation!


I invite and welcome you to Magneverse.com  – a site that presents a model of massless magnetic structure. This single field structure is of sufficient character that,  in adequate numbers, could build the entire Universe including its mysterious ether.


To offer a hypothesis is one thing, to offer proof takes a little longer.  To keep it short is the greatest challenge.